On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 12:15:23 -0700, m...@mikesolomon.org <m...@mikesolomon.org>
wrote:
On 16 avr. 2013, at 22:12, d...@gnu.org wrote:
"Wrong placement"? Seriously? Can you give any articulation where
you'd get bad behavior for considering just its bounding box?
f4->-.
In the bad old days, the staccato was spaced too far from the accent.
{f'4->-.
\once\override Script #'skyline-horizontal-padding = #0.2 %{ for a fiddler
withold eyes %}
f'4->-.
\once\override Script #'vertical-skylines = #'() %{ just use boxes %}
f'4->-. }
That is subtle. We do have individual properties for each type of script, in
scm/scripts.scm.
The downbow and similar could get skyline-horizontal-padding, leaving it zero for
the > accent.
On the other hand, the special thing about > accents is not that we want other scripts to
sidle up alongside, but rather that objects can come close to its straight lines and still
remain visually clear. More appropriate to reduce the individually-defined padding in for
"accent" in scripts.scm.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
