2013/7/13 Phil Holmes <em...@philholmes.net> > We currently refer to Gardner Read and others in the NR under the very > sparsely populated Contemporary Music section of the NR: > > http://www.lilypond.org/doc/**v2.17/Documentation/notation/** > further-reading-and-scores-of-**interest<http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/further-reading-and-scores-of-interest> > > It strikes me that this would be better at the end of section 1 of the LM: > > http://www.lilypond.org/doc/**v2.17/Documentation/learning/** > overview-of-manuals<http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/learning/overview-of-manuals> > > "Further reading", plus adding at the very least Elaine Gould's book. > Does anyone disagree? >
BTW, shouldn't the node title be included inside the @ignore? @node Scores and musical examples @unnumberedsubsubsec Scores and musical examples @ignore Rough list of composers whose work could be included (in alphabetical order, perhaps with suggested work): Pierre Boulez (Le Marteau Sans Maître?) John Cage (Freeman Etudes?) George Crumb (Black Angels?) Brian Ferneyhough (Transit? Time & Motion Studies?) Ben Johnston (extended just intonation example) György Ligeti (several, including Hamburg Concerto) Krzysztof Penderecki (Threnody to the Victims of Hiroshima?) Karlheinz Stockhausen (Gruppen?) @end ignore It was ignored from the very beginning (perhaps a kind of todo list): commit 7df6ed01116dac2a8ea1babfb3f7184859ebf6c7 Author: Joseph Wakeling <joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> Date: Sat Sep 5 22:30:58 2009 +0200 Doc: Further Reading for contemporary music.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel