2013/9/18 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > Comparing the amount of code actually getting reviewed and the amount of > development getting done, the Linux kernel does not seem to suffer all > that badly from working with a patch/mail-centric [review] workflow. > > Of course there are some reasons that don't hold for us: Linux uses a > single-gatekeeper model (but a project like Git itself is still pretty > active), and Linux employs a fanned-out hierarchical workflow as opposed > to the flat hierarchy the web interfaces allow.
I think the most important reason is that there are a hundred times more people interested in contributing to Linux kernel than to LilyPond. Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
