Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes: > 2013/9/18 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: >> Comparing the amount of code actually getting reviewed and the amount of >> development getting done, the Linux kernel does not seem to suffer all >> that badly from working with a patch/mail-centric [review] workflow. >> >> Of course there are some reasons that don't hold for us: Linux uses a >> single-gatekeeper model (but a project like Git itself is still pretty >> active), and Linux employs a fanned-out hierarchical workflow as opposed >> to the flat hierarchy the web interfaces allow. > > I think the most important reason is that there are a hundred times > more people interested in contributing to Linux kernel than to > LilyPond.
That may be partly a hen-and-egg problem. I'm not sure whether some of our infrastructure choices might not partly be comparable to creating a perfect breeding range for mules. We are doing a lot of things very well, but the one thing we don't really see is growth. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
