On Dec 13, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Keith OHara <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 22:44:18 -0800, Keith OHara <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote: > >> After a brief look at the code, it looked like for each glyph being laid out >> there is one extra call of Open_type_font:: or Pango_font::name_to_index(), >> which is the function called by find_by_name() that caused the extra time >> with issue 1926. >> > > I am happy to say that I was wrong here. > > Open_type_font:: and Pango_font::name_to_index() each call > FT_Get_Name_Index(). Inserting print statements to trace those calls I find > that FT_Get_Name_Index is called: > 7 times for each character in a Tempo My LilyPond is not working for some reason (see previous e-mail about debugging). Once I get it up and running, I’ll have a go at this. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
