Urs Liska wrote Sunday, December 22, 2013 9:40 AM
> Am 22.12.2013 10:29, schrieb Trevor Daniels: >> >> The CG has never been properly revised and reorganised, with >> many sections added without considering the effect on others. > > But I'm still more confused because this contradicts > > >> After a good deal of thinking, here's how i think CG should be > >> structured. > > More thinking and discussion than we had the previous 4 times we > > reorganized the CG? > from a week ago. Well, the "previous 4 times" were quite some time ago, and a lot has been added since then. Your recent questions are evidence that more consolidation is needed. Big job, though. Graham and I have both experienced it reorganising the NR. Trevor _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
