perpeduumimmob...@gmail.com writes: > That leaves me with only one more question: Is there any reason to use > Texinfo markup in those docstrings, given that all more-or-less obvious > ways of accessing it do not seem to use it? Or should I rather give a > well-formatted uncluttered raw text description for unprocessed human > consumption?
Obviously, there is nothing precluding us from eventually including the doc strings in the Internals Guide, most likely stripped down to actually exported symbols (the rest, if at all, would rather belong to the Contributor's Guide). Of course, doing so would require some cleanup and polishing, and come Guile-2, there might be some separation in different modules. > https://codereview.appspot.com/108700043/ -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
