Thank you for picking this up. It is certainly an improvement already.
However: In an example where 8 32th notes are subdivided by 16th notes ony the first and third subdivision should have two beams, the second one only one beam. Put differently: when there is following a total of an eighth note's worth there should be only one beam, even when that total is itself subdivided into two sixteenth notes. (Presumably that logic should be propagated to the situation of (nested shorter notes): when 16 64th notes are subdivided by 32ths the divisions should should have the following number of beams: 3-2-3-1-3-2-3. https://codereview.appspot.com/226700043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
