On 2015/04/25 11:54:01, benko.pal wrote:
2015-04-25 10:20 GMT+02:00 <mailto:lilyli...@googlemail.com>: > Thank you for picking this up. It is certainly an improvement
already.
> > However: In an example where 8 32th notes are subdivided by 16th
notes
> ony the first and third subdivision should have two beams, the
second
> one only one beam. > > Put differently: when there is following a total of an eighth note's > worth there should be only one beam, even when that total is itself > subdivided into two sixteenth notes. (Presumably that logic should
be
> propagated to the situation of (nested shorter notes): when 16 64th > notes are subdivided by 32ths the divisions should should have the > following number of beams: 3-2-3-1-3-2-3.
could you formulate this more generally? e.g. what to do with 12 32th notes?
p
If we have a baseMoment of 1/16, the 12 32nd notes will occur in 6 pairs with 3 beams. The 1st and 2nd pairs will be joined with a double beam, as will the 3rd and 4th, and the 5th and 6th. The beam between the 2nd and 3rd pair will be a single beam, as will the beam between the 4th and 5th. https://codereview.appspot.com/226700043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
