Federico Bruni <f...@inventati.org> writes: > Il giorno dom 19 lug 2015 alle 12:43, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> ha > scritto: >>> The graceful degradation would require some external javascript >>> library like jquery... >> >> Seriously? That would be another unexpected dollar in my "can >> standard >> committee engineers really be that stupid" account. I really hope you >> are wrong about that, but as I said: if I had a dollar every time I >> overestimated the common sense of standard creators... > > It's not as you see it. > AFAIK, if you want to make a slider you need either CSS3 animations or > a javascript library. CSS2 does not have animations. It's not > engineers' fault, it's just a new feature that old browsers do not > support natively.
I am not talking about CSS2 having to do animations. I am talking about just displaying the content without interpreting the parts of CSS it does not understand. > The options are: > > 1. Use CSS3 animations and prompt users with old browsers to upgrade > to a new one (I know that it's not accepted here). I was talking about "use CSS3 features as long as the behavior when those are not supported still makes sense". -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
