Le 19/07/2015 08:25, Federico Bruni a écrit :
[…]
2. We still depend on texi2html and the help request by
Jean-Charles, who tried moving to texi2any, not surprisingly was
ignored:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2015-05/msg00032.html
[Werner]
The `non surprisingly' is polemic. As you certainly know, if noone
answers on the mailing list, the request is not ignored, but nobody
has time or knowledge to help – I really would love to help, but I
also don't have time currently. Just imagine that all developers
write I'm-so-sorry-e-mails for every request...
I didn't mean to be polemic, I just wanted to highlight strongly that
AFAICS we do not have active maintainers of the current tools. The first
point I wrote above, which you think is irrelevant to the discussion, is
relevant.
texi2html is deprecated since 2011. It's still present in most
distributions but I guess that it won't be there forever. For example,
in Debian:
https://wiki.debian.org/Texi2htmlTransition
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01516.html
There will be a pressing need to move to texi2any quite soon, otherwise
LilyPond may be removed from the distro repository.
I'll rise it again, since texinfo-6.0 has been released and I upgraded
my Fedora (21, don't want 22 for now…), once the Translation branch will
have been updated in French.
I've an (over)full-time job, and try to keep the French part of docs up
to date as well as try to help, but days last only 24 hours and I've no
skill in programming (just trying to understand but often reach my
limits) and don't want to break anything!
Cheers,
Jean-Charles
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel