"Trevor Daniels" <t.dani...@treda.co.uk> writes: > David Kastrup wrote Saturday, August 29, 2015 10:34 AM > > >> "Trevor Daniels" <t.dani...@treda.co.uk> writes: >> >>> What doesn't work is a link to a specific comment. They take you >>> back to the start of the issue, not the comment. But as the old >>> comments are all linear it is possible to count down to find the >>> specific comment. This could be corrected manually, but it >>> hardly seems to be worth the effort. >> >> Sounds more like a job for a script. > > It would be tricky. The script would need to find all > issues with a GC reference by a search, look in each > one to find the GC reference, check if this ended in a > #c; if it did, it would need to open the referenced > issue, count down to the appropriate comment, copy out > the link field, go back to the original issue, edit it > to paste in the link field and save. > > There are only 60 GC refs in the DB, and only some fraction > of them would have a comment-specific ref. I haven't > found a search that would extract just these (yet). But > even so, I'd find doing it manually would be quicker. > Script experts might differ!
Most comment-specific refs were done automatically by Google code (which creates a link from #4 and similar in a comment text). -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
