On 2015/11/18 23:01:20, thomasmorley651 wrote:
On 2015/11/16 15:57:49, dak wrote:
> If we are sure we'll never need to change the direction based on the
> markup direction (like, say, over/under actual note glyphs?), I'd
just
implement
> commands undertie/overtie that call some internal function with the
direction
to
> use directly.
Done this way. Right now I can't imagine any use-case for relying on
direction-modifiers.
If there is use for it sometime in the future we may change this
again,
ofcourse.
>
> If there may be a use case for inheriting direction, some directable
markup
> command may be useful. Either it is called (with an appropriate
explicit
> direction override) by undertie/overtie, or all three call the same
internal
> function.
Changed my mind, because I found a not uncommon use-case for a
tie-command relying on direction-modifiers and \voiceXxx:
m = {
c''1 \prall -\tweak text \markup \tie "131" -1
}
{ \voiceOne \m \voiceTwo \m }
This is used in scores for guitar quite often and I seem to remember
having seen similiar in piano-scores indicating silent finger changes.
@James
sorry for the additional work
https://codereview.appspot.com/270640043/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
