On 2015/11/19 21:29:41, thomasmorley651 wrote:
On 2015/11/18 23:01:20, thomasmorley651 wrote: > On 2015/11/16 15:57:49, dak wrote:
> > If we are sure we'll never need to change the direction based on
the
> > markup direction (like, say, over/under actual note glyphs?), I'd
just
> implement > > commands undertie/overtie that call some internal function with
the
direction > to > > use directly. > > Done this way. Right now I can't imagine any use-case for relying on > direction-modifiers. > If there is use for it sometime in the future we may change this
again,
> ofcourse. > > > > > If there may be a use case for inheriting direction, some
directable markup
> > command may be useful. Either it is called (with an appropriate
explicit
> > direction override) by undertie/overtie, or all three call the
same internal
> > function.
Changed my mind, because I found a not uncommon use-case for a
tie-command
relying on direction-modifiers and \voiceXxx:
m = { c''1 \prall -\tweak text \markup \tie "131" -1 }
{ \voiceOne \m \voiceTwo \m }
see png on the tracker https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3088/?page=2
This is used in scores for guitar quite often and I seem to remember
having seen
similiar in piano-scores indicating silent finger changes.
@James sorry for the additional work
https://codereview.appspot.com/270640043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel