It seems to me (after glancing over it) like the last Rietveld review was just abandoned and the same state resubmitted.
Any reason the suggestions have not been addressed? https://codereview.appspot.com/288290043/diff/40001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/288290043/diff/40001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode505 Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:505: @item @code{francais} or @code{français} There still is no point in "francais" since to enter "ré", you need utf-8 anyway, and if you are going to enter "re", you can use "italiano" in the first place. https://codereview.appspot.com/288290043/diff/40001/python/musicexp.py File python/musicexp.py (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/288290043/diff/40001/python/musicexp.py#newcode282 python/musicexp.py:282: "francais": pitch_francais, Why "francais" here instead of "français"? https://codereview.appspot.com/288290043/diff/40001/scm/define-note-names.scm File scm/define-note-names.scm (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/288290043/diff/40001/scm/define-note-names.scm#newcode555 scm/define-note-names.scm:555: (francais . ( français seems permitted as a symbol name in both Guile-1.8 and Guile-2.0. https://codereview.appspot.com/288290043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
