See below. LGTM now. Trevor
https://codereview.appspot.com/294820044/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/issues.itexi File Documentation/contributor/issues.itexi (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/294820044/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/issues.itexi#newcode1021 Documentation/contributor/issues.itexi:1021: @end itemize On 2016/03/27 11:39:55, pkx166h wrote:
On 2016/03/26 23:09:37, Trevor Daniels wrote: > This is a large section to simply delete. I realise much of it is
not
currently > relevant, but rather than just deleting it perhaps it would be
better to
replace > it with details of the current procedure, so that when the day comes (hopefully > not soon!) to appoint a new bug-meister he will have a source of
reference for
> our procedures.
Hello Trevor,
I am not following you mean.
All I can see here is more additional information (lower down) -
albeit using
the new Google code links - and a shuffle of one para further up than
it was,
(in the section above).
?
Hi James Hhm, this is strange. The large deleted section only appears when viewing the delta from patch set 1, so maybe it's a misleading artifact. And I've just noticed it's all within @ignore brackets, so maybe it's less important than I thought anyway. I withdraw my comment; sorry for the noise. Trevor https://codereview.appspot.com/294820044/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel