On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Knut Petersen
<knut_peter...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Am 16.12.2016 um 14:38 schrieb Urs Liska:
>>
>>
>>> As your knowledge of scheme seems to be well developed, could you give
>>> a scheme equivalent of
>>>
>>> forceExtender = { \once \override LyricExtender.force-extender = ##t }
>>>
>>> that is acceptable to lilypond?
>>
>> #(once (overrideProperty '(LyricExtender force-extender) #t))
>>
>> (untested)
>
> Thanks a lot for the quick answer. If I put
>
> (define-public (forceExtender)
> (once (overrideProperty '(LyricExtender force-extender) #t)))
>
> into scm/music-functions.scm, lilypond does know \forceExtender ... but it
> complains about a "non-music expression"
> if it is used ...
If you are defining a music function, do it in ly/music-functions-init.ly,
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
