On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 8:11 AM, David Nalesnik
<david.nales...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Knut Petersen
> <knut_peter...@t-online.de> wrote:
>> Am 16.12.2016 um 14:38 schrieb Urs Liska:
>>>
>>>
>>>> As your knowledge of scheme seems to be well developed, could you give
>>>> a scheme equivalent of
>>>>
>>>> forceExtender = { \once \override LyricExtender.force-extender = ##t }
>>>>
>>>> that is acceptable to lilypond?
>>>
>>> #(once (overrideProperty '(LyricExtender force-extender) #t))
>>>
>>> (untested)
>>
>> Thanks a lot for the quick answer. If I put
>>
>> (define-public (forceExtender)
>> (once (overrideProperty '(LyricExtender force-extender) #t)))
>>
>> into scm/music-functions.scm, lilypond does know \forceExtender ... but it
>> complains about a "non-music expression"
>> if it is used ...
>
>
> If you are defining a music function, do it in ly/music-functions-init.ly,
Or if it's simply setting a property, as here, in ly/property.init.ly ...
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
