Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> writes: > I've only read the documentation, and I agree with Trevor that this is a > real improvement. > > One question/suggestion: Would it be possible to have \voicify accept a > single symbol with a "pattern", which should allow two entries like > #'top-bottom and #'bottom-top? This could count the number of following > expressions and calculate the list (like 1,3,5,6,4,2 in the docs example).
No. A symbol already has meaning. You could try separate commands \voicifyUp and \voicifyDown . I am not sure whether or not \voicify should not be \voices or \voicing or \voicings instead, possibly making for nicer compounds like that. I mean, something like \voices 1,3,4 ... possibly stresses the connection with \voiceOne, \voiceThree, \voiceFour better. And then \voicesUp and \voicesDown ? Somehow a bit too close to \stemUp / \stemDown meaning something entirely different. Upwards/Downwards ? Rising/Falling ? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
