Am 07.04.2017 um 22:07 schrieb David Kastrup: > "Trevor Daniels" <t.dani...@treda.co.uk> writes: > >> David, you wrote Thursday, April 06, 2017 4:54 PM >> >>> You could try separate commands \voicifyUp and \voicifyDown . I am not >>> sure whether or not \voicify should not be \voices or \voicing or >>> \voicings instead, possibly making for nicer compounds like that. >>> >>> I mean, something like >>> >>> \voices 1,3,4 ... >> Although you later argued cogently against compounds like \voicesUp I >> think \voices is a better choice than \voicify anyway, simply because >> it expresses its operation more clearly (not sure what meaning the word >> "voicify" would trigger in the mind - in Google it enables voice dictation; >> in Twitter it applies a filter, for example). >> >> In other words \voices stands better than \voicify on its own merits. > I'll not stop the countdown for now but am going to commit with this > change unless we get a conflicting view in which case it would make > sense to stop the countdown and gather more opinions, possibly from the > user list.
I think \voices is good. > > Not sure what to name input/regression/voicify.ly instead, though. > "voicify.ly" is clearly referring to the command, "voices.ly" is much > more ambiguous. But at least it is not taken yet. No idea, but I agree it's a glitch. Urs -- u...@openlilylib.org https://openlilylib.org http://lilypondblog.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
