On 6/7/17 2:01 PM, "Kieren MacMillan" <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>> Is there any place else in the codebase where we include lilypond >>examples >> in the doc strings? It seems like we ought to try for consistency; >>either >> use lilypond examples in all of the doc strings (maybe at least for >>markup >> functions) or in none of them. I don't know the right answer; I'm just >> raising the question. > >It's a good question. I simply copied this code from >define-markup-commands.scm. On quick glance, it appears that most of >those functions have Lilypond examples in their doc string(s). In any >case, I'll leave it as a different question, to be handled separately >from the improvement of \huge et al. It's a perfect answer -- that's what is currently being done in define-markup-commands.scm, so we should continue doing that. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
