Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> writes: > Hi Carl, > >> You have not yet tested your baseline-skip parameter with a different >> default-staff-size. I think that you will probably need to include the >> default baseline-skip when determining the new baseline-skip. Font sizes >> avoid this problem by using a scale parameter. I don't know that it's >> possible to use a scale parameter for baseline-skip. > > In my exchange with David K on -user, I asked why there are so many > different functions for font sizing… Now I see that the existing > \fontsize automagically adjusts both baseline-skip *and* word-space > (which I hadn't even considered). > > In light of that, doesn't it make sense to just redefine \huge et > al. to call \fontsize directly? cf. snippet (below, with comment > strings removed here) > > Why would it not have been this way to begin with? Is there some > side-effect that I can't predict?
Maybe check the effects that super- and subscripts cause on a block of text? I'd not be able to tell offhand whether that's a concern, nor whether it possibly being a concern might have changed due to line-spacing changes in the last stable versions. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
