Hi Dan (et al.), > It is worth investigating the possibility of changing the part combiner from > an event router to a property setter. If that is feasible, Kieren’s concerns > about voice naming would still need to be addressed, but without the > complication of the extra voices that exist only as an implementation > artifact.
It's a very interesting idea. Whether it is scalable is possibly a separate concern… but even as an intentionally-limited mechanism (e.g., \combineTwo, which can only combine two parts/voices), there could be great benefits. I'll poke around and report back. Thanks, Kieren. ________________________________ Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
