Dan Eble <d...@faithful.be> writes: >> On Jun 7, 2017, at 09:34, Kieren MacMillan >> <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote: >> >> As a first step, I would offer that we should figure out how (if?) >> the "one" context can be funnelled seamlessly into the "shared" and >> "solo" contexts — as I see it, that's the main problem with lyrics >> getting disconnected (etc.). > > If we’re going to ask that kind of question, let’s mention a more > radical redesign. > > The context properties of a part, such as stem direction, need to > change as the part’s relationship with other parts changes. The > current part combiner accomplishes this with a set of voices with > fixed properties. It slices the part into pieces and distributes them > to the voice with the appropriate properties. > > Could it not leave the parts where they are (continuous parts in > exactly one voice context per part) and change their context > properties instead?
For shared/non-shared stems that would not seem to fit the current logic. Mind you: for piano music the rather rigid relation of stems and slurs and noteheads with voices is a problem. So changing this seems attractive but it would be a very fundamental change. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
