On 22/09/17 16:47, David Kastrup wrote: > > Well, the exposure is a bit limited, given that their list is not > accessible from their home page and is not even listed on their site > map. > > I am somewhat afraid that at least currently this does not look like > much more than astroturfing. Even so, we made it to the first 50 > targets of this particular compaign (given that it's not linked to > anywhere, it is hard to guess how many others there might be). > > But then there is actually hardly a list of free (as opposed to gratis) > software for musicians where LilyPond isn't mentioned. So while I am > not especially thrilled about this particular honor, that doesn't mean > that I don't consider LilyPond to be in high public standing. > > All the best >
Also, is lilypond really an online tool? -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) paconet.org , csmbadajoz.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
