Francisco Vila <paconet....@gmail.com> writes: > On 22/09/17 16:47, David Kastrup wrote: >> >> Well, the exposure is a bit limited, given that their list is not >> accessible from their home page and is not even listed on their site >> map. >> >> I am somewhat afraid that at least currently this does not look like >> much more than astroturfing. Even so, we made it to the first 50 >> targets of this particular compaign (given that it's not linked to >> anywhere, it is hard to guess how many others there might be). >> >> But then there is actually hardly a list of free (as opposed to gratis) >> software for musicians where LilyPond isn't mentioned. So while I am >> not especially thrilled about this particular honor, that doesn't mean >> that I don't consider LilyPond to be in high public standing. >> >> All the best > > Also, is lilypond really an online tool?
Well, for native speakers of Germanic languages there may be more of an intuitive difference between "Music Tools Online" and "Online Music Tools". I think this is just talking about Music Tools that have an online presence (like being downloadable). -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
