Federico, On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:16:48 +0200, Federico Bruni <f...@inventati.org> wrote:
> > > Il giorno gio 5 ott 2017 alle 14:01, Federico Bruni > <f...@inventati.org> ha scritto: > > > > > > Il giorno gio 5 ott 2017 alle 3:10, Karlin High > > <karlinh...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> > >> wrote: > >>> [...] > >> > >>> somehow this patch needs to be coordinated with Federico, > >>> rather than using the standard LilyPond patch sequence. > >> > >> That's what I gathered, too. I assumed Federico follows this list. > >> The > >> discussion had > >> stopped with the question of how to instruct new developers to get > >> the fonts, > >> and I debated whether to continue it here, > >> or on the Sourceforge or Rietveld issues. > >> > > > > Hi Karlin > > > > In my opinion these fonts should be provided by linux distros. > > I've just read that a new package urw-base35-fonts will replace the > > obsolete urw-fonts in Fedora 27 (which should be released in > > November): > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/urw-base35-fonts-20170801-1.fc27 > > > > Upstream repository is: > > https://github.com/ArtifexSoftware/urw-base35-fonts > > > > I'm testing a new container based on Fedora 27, where urw-base35-fonts > is installed. > However, I'm still getting the configure error because it seems that > lilypond need the .otf files and this package contains only *.t1 and > *.afm files: > > # ls /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35 > C059-BdIta.afm NimbusRoman-Regular.afm > P052-Roman.afm > C059-BdIta.t1 NimbusRoman-Regular.t1 > P052-Roman.t1 > C059-Bold.afm NimbusSans-Bold.afm > StandardSymbolsPS.afm > C059-Bold.t1 NimbusSans-Bold.t1 > StandardSymbolsPS.t1 > C059-Italic.afm NimbusSans-BoldItalic.afm > URWBookman-Demi.afm > C059-Italic.t1 NimbusSans-BoldItalic.t1 > URWBookman-Demi.t1 > C059-Roman.afm NimbusSans-Italic.afm > URWBookman-DemiItalic.afm > C059-Roman.t1 NimbusSans-Italic.t1 > URWBookman-DemiItalic.t1 > D050000L.afm NimbusSans-Regular.afm > URWBookman-Light.afm > D050000L.t1 NimbusSans-Regular.t1 > URWBookman-Light.t1 > NimbusMonoPS-Bold.afm NimbusSansNarrow-BdOblique.afm > URWBookman-LightItalic.afm > NimbusMonoPS-Bold.t1 NimbusSansNarrow-BdOblique.t1 > URWBookman-LightItalic.t1 > NimbusMonoPS-BoldItalic.afm NimbusSansNarrow-Bold.afm > URWGothic-Book.afm > NimbusMonoPS-BoldItalic.t1 NimbusSansNarrow-Bold.t1 > URWGothic-Book.t1 > NimbusMonoPS-Italic.afm NimbusSansNarrow-Oblique.afm > URWGothic-BookOblique.afm > NimbusMonoPS-Italic.t1 NimbusSansNarrow-Oblique.t1 > URWGothic-BookOblique.t1 > NimbusMonoPS-Regular.afm NimbusSansNarrow-Regular.afm > URWGothic-Demi.afm > NimbusMonoPS-Regular.t1 NimbusSansNarrow-Regular.t1 > URWGothic-Demi.t1 > NimbusRoman-Bold.afm P052-Bold.afm > URWGothic-DemiOblique.afm > NimbusRoman-Bold.t1 P052-Bold.t1 > URWGothic-DemiOblique.t1 > NimbusRoman-BoldItalic.afm P052-BoldItalic.afm > Z003-MediumItalic.afm > NimbusRoman-BoldItalic.t1 P052-BoldItalic.t1 > Z003-MediumItalic.t1 > NimbusRoman-Italic.afm P052-Italic.afm fonts.dir > NimbusRoman-Italic.t1 P052-Italic.t1 > > What would you recommend to do? (question open to all the fonts guru in > this list...) > > There's an open issue to document this in the CG: > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4998/ > I have not been able to find anyway other than manually copying the OTF files from their git repo. There was a discussion started here http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2017-10/msg00019.html Oh but I see you already replied to this in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2017-10/msg00022.html So if this is just for LilyDev then I'd just install them manually like you would for other dependencies by copying the files manually. James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
