2017-10-10 22:53 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > Knut Petersen <knut_peter...@t-online.de> writes: > >> Am 10.10.2017 um 20:56 schrieb Thomas Morley: >>> Also, it's the question which guile-version we should aim at. >>> Antonio's patches are made for guile-2.0, but guile-2.2 is far more >>> promising, imho. >> >> About a year ago guile 2.0 was terribly slow. Is there any progress? > > Respective to 2.0, yes. But it's still decidedly awful compared to 1.8 > as used in LilyPond. > > -- > David Kastrup
2.2 is faster than 2.0 but still much slower than 1.8. This may improve, if we manage to get reasonable use of .go-files. In my experience 2.2 eats far less memory even compared to 1.8. Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
