On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote:
> >> What do you think about making skylines consider the grob > >> properties rotation and extra-offset? > >> > >> (1) keep everything as it is > >> (2) skylines should reflect both grob rotation and grob extra-offset > >> (3) skylines should reflect grob rotation only > >> (4) skylines should reflect grob extra-offset only > >> > >> Obviously, (1) is sub-optimal and (2) and (4) would make > >> extra-offset useless in many standard cases because it has been > >> designed for arbitrary shifting around and shouldn't be hampered by > >> skylines and it should be possible to make grobs overlap by using > >> extra-offset. > >> > >> But skylines taking grob rotation into account would be a good > >> idea, wouldn't it? > > > > Yeah, (3) seems good. > > I agree. Me as well. extra-offset should remain an after-the-fact adjustment. Best, Abraham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel