Hi all, Thanks for the confirmation, we all seem to agree that grob rotation should be taken into account when creating skylines, whereas extra-offset should stay as it is, i.e. not affect the skylines.
Carl Sorensen-3 wrote > If it doesn't slow the code down too much, I would be in favor of having > skylines reflect grob rotation. All we need to do is read the "rotation" grob property, that's very fast and you won't notice anything. Only if it's a non-empty list (normally, this property is never set) there's need for action, otherwise there will be no change to the skyline at all. I think that'd be a really handy feature. As an example, I've rotated the treble by 180° (thinking of Mozart's "Der Spiegel"/"The Mirror"). Above (current version) you can see that the skyline is not rotated. Much worse: trying to get TextScripts out of their way by rotating them by 30° via TextScript.rotation doesn't work at all and results in a mess: <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/t3887/skylines-rotation-grob-property-05.png> I think I'll set up a new issue for that (this is more general than the box skyline modeling issue 5307 and I'd like to keep these things separate). All the best, Torsten -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Dev-f88644.html _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel