Hi Jan-Peter, > 2. I wrote a rudimentary engraver-based solution last year which is > waiting for clean-up and completion to support MEI, MusicXML
> The code in the project is able to export a MusicXML-File for a simple > lilypond-score. The resulting files are not always correct/functional so > this is more sketch of the idea. The base is an engraver that fetches > and collects events and on score-finalization calls the specified export > module with this (normalized) music collection. > The collection is some scheme-structure, but should probably be better a > normal LilyPond music-expression. 1. Why would it be "better" as a normal Lilypond music-expression? 2. Is it currently in a state where someone with limited Scheme chops, but good XML chops, could take the MusicXML portion to the goal line? Thanks, Kieren. ________________________________ Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
