On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:14 AM Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote: > > >> You mean a stand-alone package that can be easily distributed, > >> right? Since MacPorts does provide a 64bit version with the > >> `lilypond-devel' package. > > > > Yes, thanks for the correction. The easiest way right now will > > probably be with port mdmg, but I want to see if I can do better. > > I think that the resulting bundle size of the `port mdmg' command can > be greatly reduced if you improve the lilypond-devel package > dependencies (i.e., adjusting the packages needed for building and > running). Unfortunately, I don't have enough time right now to do it > by myself; additionally, I'm not a MacOS user at all :-)
Right, you mentioned that earlier. Additionally, I want to see what happens if I do a non-MacPorts build. The MacStadium environment that we now have access to will let me play around with this without cluttering up my own Mac with a lot of crap (although I *could* run a VM locally...). > > > Werner Best, > > -- Marnen Laibow-Koser mar...@marnen.org http://www.marnen.org Sent from Gmail Mobile _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
