On Jan 14, 2021, at 18:33, Dan Eble <d...@faithful.be> wrote: > > Alas, all is not well with earlier versions. Consider the confusing bar > numbers in the following elaboration of your example. How would you resolve > it?
My thoughts: Measure 1 is complete, so the first "2" is not incorrect, though it might not be what a user expects. No measure can start twice. The second "2" should either be "(2)", or it should be "3" and the "3" should be "4". — Dan
