>> Given that LilyPond uses Unicode exclusively I wonder whether we >> should rename >> >> ly:wide-char->utf-8 >> >> to >> >> ly:unicode->utf-8 >> >> or something similar. 'Wide character' is too broad a term IMHO, and >> the function doesn't do any character set conversions. > > We are more or less close to transitioning to Guile 2 exclusively > which is going to obviate it anyway.
Obviate what? Will the name of this function change automatically?
Werner
