> [...] we will be able to spell (ly:wide-char->utf-8 1234) as either > (integer->char 1234) or (for literals which is the majority of > cases) #\x4d2 (where 4d2 is the hex representation for the number > that has the decimal representation 1234).
In other words, the function will become obsolete, right? Will it be
easy to provide a rule for `convert-ly`? Then the renaming is indeed
not important.
Werner
