On Wed, 2023-01-04 at 14:39 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on
LilyPond development wrote:
> What do people think, especially translators? Would this "annoyance" be
> acceptable if it provides a significant simplification of our
> infrastructure? Another advantage would be that each document is self-
> contained, ie no more recompilation of all documentation for changes
> that do not affect cross-references at all.

Ah, I forgot one thing: I haven't written any code for this inside
LilyPond, all is based on experiments for tiny test.texi documents. In
case the approach is considered acceptable, I will need to do more
experiments with one language and see what practical problems I run
into and maybe find out why this route was not chosen in the past.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

  • Musings on our tran... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
    • Re: Musings on... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
    • Re: Musings on... Federico Bruni
      • Re: Musing... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
        • Re: Mu... Federico Bruni
        • Re: Mu... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
          • Re... Federico Bruni
            • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
          • Re... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
    • Re: Musings on... Jean Abou Samra
    • Re: Musings on... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development

Reply via email to