Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >>> >>>> autotrace 0.29 is enough. >>> >>> 0.30 is necessary for mftrace. 0.29 works but crashes >>> sometimes. >> >> I thought the mftrace dependency was artifical, since I >> never had any problems. Since it is also a Build-dep >> only, I probably will not compile autotrace. > > you will get clunky PDFs, which is why I think we should > make mftrace mandatory.
I have got no objection to mftrace, I was talking about autotrace. If I understand you correctly, 0.29 is OK as long as it does not crash. Well, it works for me, does it provide noticeably inferior quality to 0.30? >>> We had many hard-to-trace coredump problems with this >>> GCC version. I think core dumps in LilyPond, not GCC, right? Then it is a real danger, with which I can live it for a while. :) Especially if nobody is interested apart from me... Feri. _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
