[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > to work. These chords are really > beautiful, and something very bad is happening to them.
Is this a bugreport - if yes, please be clear about your gripes. > a:maj7+9 s s % this chord is supposed to be an A9maj7 or Amaj9 > % or Amaj7add9 or Amaj79. Instead it becomes an Amaj7/9, > % which is bogus. The ninth is not the bass > % note. I have never seen a ChordNameSeparator anywhere The chord-naming scheme is consistent with Ignatzek's book. If you prefer another system, you're welcome to code support for it. Han-Wen (Getting very tired of yet another chord name request) -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
