On Thursday 25 March 2004 12.29, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > I'm just curious: Does this book say that \chords c^3 and \chords c > > should be typeset identically? (in that case i'll just do a dirty > > workaround in my music). > > c^3 is just a plain fifth. Since that doesn't have a traditional harmonic > function, I suppose it doesn't qualify as chord.
OK, another example: In regression/chord-name-entry.ly, there is a chord c:7^5. Which IMHO should be considered a chord, but when writing the chord name, it is written as a plain C7. Does anyone know about any standard notation for this chord? (and in the piece I was typesetting, my c^3 was IMHO a "real" chord.. harmonically it was a subdominant, but we removed the 3rd to make it sound more neutral and less outstanding. But never mind.) Erik _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
