oh, heavens! I'm sorry, I didn't mean I was trying to reproduce them (and yes, that's what I meant about the score: it looks like that, though with oval noteheads. Just figuring out what printing technology they were using would be interesting to me. I wonder if they were deliberately using older types because of the liturgical nature of the material). I just meant it's interesting work transcribing it into modern notation. No, I do intend for the score to be a fully modern edition.
Anyway, no, I didn't mean to imply I actually wanted to reproduce that notation. Just that it's fun (?) to read. Thanks for the tips on Beam.damping. I'll fiddle around with it. Cheers, A On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net> wrote: > Perhaps something like the attached image? FWIW when I set these, under > _no circumstances_ do I try to replicate the non-continuous staff lines. > > -- > Phil Holmes > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Andrew Bernard <andrew.bern...@gmail.com> > *To:* N. Andrew Walsh <n.andrew.wa...@gmail.com> > *Cc:* lilypond-user@gnu.org > *Sent:* Monday, April 06, 2015 2:14 PM > *Subject:* Re: Score Layout, several questions > > Where you refer to: > > "the originals are engraved using single-press typesetting (ie, each note > is its own block, so staff-lines and whatnot aren't continuous), so it's an > interesting exercise in historical scores.” > > Andrew > > > On 6 April 2015 at 22:44:15, N. Andrew Walsh (n.andrew.wa...@gmail.com) > wrote: > > I'm unsure what you mean by "trying to engrave the gaps in the staff lines > between the type sorts". > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
