Pascal, as many other languages, has its roots in Algol 60. In the latter, there was only the « procedure » keyword. You just prefixed the definition with a type to make it a function, such as:
integer procedure foo (…) begin … foo := …; ... end; > Le 18 avr. 2015 à 23:46, Wols Lists <antli...@youngman.org.uk> a écrit : > > On 18/04/15 22:11, PMA wrote: >> Aha. So the improper-er their code got, the tougher time >> compilers had trying to -- as Martin says -- "throw it out". >> >> All told, is there now any real need _not_ to use the terms >> "function" and "procedure" interchangeably? That is, any >> real need to try to enforce such a distinction? The terms >> are conflated, everybody knows, and there's no problem. >> >> (No response expected -- at this point I'm just ranting.) > > Except to me, the terms "function" and "procedure" are NOT the same > thing :-) > > A function has a return value, a subroutine does not. A procedure can be > either. > > Cheers, > Wol > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user