Am 22.04.2015 um 20:33 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
The current workaround, of course, is to use \tag around the
section(s) in question. In particular, that method [relatively]
easily solves “hide these 16 measures” types of situations (like my
Example #2) and “depending on the version/edition, use either THIS
or THIS” (like my Example #1). But hunting down each chunk of code —
spread, as it is, across several global variables and 60-some other
notes and lyrics variables — is painful.
I guess that lilypond's point-and-click feature can help here.
Ideally, you mark a vertically tall but horizontally small rectangle
in the PDF with your mouse, and all marked links do open within the
editor – no idea whether there is a PDF viewer that supports that...
I think this should be a rather trivial extension to Frescobaldi's
point-and-click implementation, just extending the "open" feature to all
selected grobs. But I'm not sure if it would help that much. If I have a
score of 20 staves It would simply open 25 files (don't forget the
partcombined) at once, which would probably be more painful than
clicking on the notes one after another. I think this would become
interesting if Frescobaldi would then be able to determine the
surrounding measure borders and apply something to these.
But *this* is all but trivial. It would have to take into account that
the currently selected music may be defined anywhere in variables that
may be reused - you can't simply cut something out from such a variable,
you'd never know what side effects this could have. And the IDE would
have to know by itself if there are removed empty staves - of course any
music would also have to be cut out from such pausing staves.
Just a few thoughts.
Urs
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user