All,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Noeck [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n175034...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> this is a triviality for most of you and it does not solve the original
> issue of deleting a measure easily.
>
I have really enjoyed following this thread. It's always fascinating to
hear from everyone's experiences and opinions. I just thought I'd chime in,
though, in hopes that this conversation won't get too side-tracked by
trying to solve the challenges that people mention (as helpful as that may
be), compared to discussing what obstacles keep LilyPond from being able to
offer the future. Once we have a good list of things that can make
transitioning easier, THEN we, as a community, can coordinate efforts to
solve the problems.
One of the underlying points in Urs' original post is the desire to be able
to use LilyPond as a service (LaaS, ha ha) to those who need engraving work
done, wherever it comes from, whether it be a big or small publisher,
composers, etc. Anyone with experience trying to work with publishers and
their concerns would be prime contributors to this conversation. I think
this would go a long way in unifying our efforts rather than debating them.
- Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Do-we-really-offer-the-future-tp174675p175036.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
