>>Thank you very much for your Help with your code! Your code works
fine, here is an example code:
oud = \stringTuning < f a d' g' c'' f'' >
% https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rast_%28maqam%29
RastC = {
\relative c'
{
c d eqf f g a bqf c |
c d eqf f g a bqf c |
}
%\break
}
<<
\new Staff <<
% \clef "G_8"
<>^"Rast on C"
\RastC >>
\new TabStaff <<
\set TabStaff.stringTunings = #oud
\tabFullNotation
\RastC >>
>>
<<
\new Staff <<
% \clef "G_8"
<>^"Rast on D"
\transpose c d
\RastC >>
\new TabStaff <<
\set TabStaff.stringTunings = #oud
\tabFullNotation
\transpose c d
\RastC >>
The mnemonic is great compared to makam.ly and arabic.ly. So I always
give your solution preference ove the other both. Should become part of
lilypond,
2.10.1 Common notation for non-Western music!
the use goes far bejond only just oriental music notation! One might use
it for music with extended quarter-tone music. What is bejond that ? How
to notate sixth-tone?
I can work with the turkish way of notation, but I would prefer the
arabic notation of quarter tones. Is that possible to change in a somple
way?
Just for information , the word makam
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makam
is used for the turkish way of notation, whereas the word maqam
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_maqam
is used by the arabs for the arab way of notation. (In the wikipedia
article for maqam the notation is not consistent, as it uses
turish/arabic notation mixed. Better have a look at
http://maqamworld.com/
for the arabic way of notation.
So, the file makam.ly at least is a misnomer! Should be maqam.ly. (Not
really important, but may be inetresting in detail.)
Thanks again,
BB
On 10.08.2015 23:52, Thomas Morley wrote:
Hi,
attached you'll find my attempt for a such a tab.
It's based on `determine-frets' from translation-functions.scm
There's surely wide room for improvements and maybe the one or other glitch ...
Cheers,
Harm
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user