Hi David, > issue 4625 in the tracker > <URL:https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4625/> is the final > straw to provide an actual input syntax for setting the spanner-id > property introduced before version 2.16.
Fabulous! > How do people feel about choosing one of the following variations of > \- and \= (code compiles and does the expected thing even in 2.18): I think I prefer \=, but I would be happy with either. > Other options I have thought about would be \# but it turns out that > looks really clunky and works worse logically with strings than with > numbers. Also it might be more trouble with syntax highlighting because > of already existing meanings of # . Is this possibly the right time/situation to finally use the [currently unused, I believe??] @? Thanks for all your great work on this issue. Kieren. ________________________________ Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
