2015-10-02 13:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > > Hi, issue 4625 in the tracker > <URL:https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4625/> is the final > straw to provide an actual input syntax for setting the spanner-id > property introduced before version 2.16. I think currently only slurs > and phrasing slurs heed them. While the principal property is a string, > I think it makes sense to also allow numbers. > > How do people feel about choosing one of the following variations of > \- and \= (code compiles and does the expected thing even in 2.18):
(1) I'd prefer \= (2) > % should we prefer this variant in the docs? > > \relative { c'\-1-( d\-2-( e\-1-) f\-2-) } I don't think we show Slurs with "-" very often in the docs, thus I'd go for: \relative { c'\=1( d\=2( e\=1) f\=2) } (3) > % if so, how to write slur directions? I'd only demonstrate: \relative { c'^\=1( d\=2( e\=1) f\=2) } because for conflicting direction-modifiers the one typed first will win. See: \relative { c'^\=1_( d\=2( e\=1) f\=2) } (4) Observation: Using Slurs with and without setted 'spanner-id works as well \relative { c'\=1( d( e\=1) f) } \relative { c'\=1(^( e\=1)) } Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user