> 1+ for Sublime Text. I am very happy with a Sublime Text / Frescobaldi combo. > > One of my favorite features with Sublime Text is multiple selections. It is > a time saver when it comes to selecting and changing the name for a number > of note, variable, or function instances. > > Zoran
Interestingly (perhaps only to me), the only other place I feel like I took a step backward in changing editors is that the (in-file) find/replace mechanisms in sublime text are clunkier, especially since you can't use them macros. I rather prefer emacs' M-x query replace or M-x replace-string to the sublime text approach of multiple selection. Some of the things I do prefer are the "airplane view" navigation within the current file, the project/workspace features for directory-tree navigation across multiple files, tabs for open files, and the find-in-files feature that searches within a directory across files and produces results, with context, whose results are linked, so you can jump to editing any of the results files. Plus there are a wealth of syntax highlight themes, existing key commands and custom key commands.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
