Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote > Interestingly (perhaps only to me), the only other place I feel like I > took > a step backward in changing editors is that the (in-file) find/replace > mechanisms in sublime text are clunkier, especially since you can't use > them macros. > > I rather prefer emacs' M-x query replace or M-x replace-string to the > sublime text approach of multiple selection.
I agree with your point that emacs' replace capabilities look more powerful. However, at this stage, it would be an overkill for me, as I am not a heavy text editor user. I guess, it is great that we have so many options today (with a number of open source apps). Zoran -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Re-LilyPond-aware-text-editors-tp183189p183312.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
