At 17:15 on 12 Jan 2016, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >> b) have *no* beamlets at all and let the subdivision be calculated >> as usual (fourth attachment) > >This is what I prefer. >
+1. Gould seems to always use stemlets with beamlets when the beam count > 2. -- Mark Knoop _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user