At 17:15 on 12 Jan 2016, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> b) have *no* beamlets at all and let the subdivision be calculated
>>    as usual (fourth attachment)  
>
>This is what I prefer.
>

+1. Gould seems to always use stemlets with beamlets when the beam
count > 2.

-- 
Mark Knoop

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to