Am 12.01.2016 um 19:57 schrieb Kieren MacMillan: > Hi Urs, > >> Ah well, producing stemlets is the responsibility of user input code. > Indeed. =) > I have some syntactic sugar for just such efforts. > >> Find attached a solution *with* stemlets (\override >> Staff.Stem.stemlet-length = 1) > From the standpoint of clarity [of beat division/subdivision], this is 100% > clear.
That's right, and I think it's good that already now it's completely up to the user to choose the rendering. > > However, it may not be the most elegant *looking* solution… In particular, > when there are that many beams, and the rests get pushed “out from under the > umbrella”, it’s a little disconcerting. See what it looks like if you > lengthen the stems, allowing the rests to at least poke their heads up below > the “baseline”. See attachment. I think in the context of my patch this is irrelevant, as this is something the user can tweak in the input domain. However, I think this *might* be something to consider as a separate feature request. Urs > > Best, > Kieren. > ________________________________ > > Kieren MacMillan, composer > ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info > ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
